Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 8581 - 8600
of 21,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2016, 2:01 pm
This ties into the previous notion that taking extra precautions would be expensive, especially if test results suggested it might be a redundant step. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 12:03 pm
The substantial evidence test requires courts to view the record in a light favorable to the verdict, with any conflict resolved in favor of the verdict. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Helmerich & Payne outlines a very different test for determining whether courts have jurisdiction over lawsuits brought under the expropriation exception. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:34 am
VW has been accused of implementing software [JURIST report] in its vehicles that could cheat emissions tests. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:48 am
Compliance with the Privacy and Security Rules of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a living process that requires employer and other health plans, health insurers, health care providers and healthcare clearinghouses to recurrently reevaluate their HIPAA enterprise risk and timely act to mitigate security threats to electronic (ePHI) and other protected health information and other HIPAA compliance concerns on an ongoing basis. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
The $1,439,250 was reduced by .5% for what the jury found to be the contributory fault of the plaintiff. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
The $1,439,250 was reduced by .5% for what the jury found to be the contributory fault of the plaintiff. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
In September 2015, the German automaker Volkswagen (VW) admitted that it had manipulated software in around eleven million diesel vehicles worldwide to cheat on emissions tests. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 6:22 am
Brodsky is testing whether you believe the official spin or actually know something about this. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:51 am
A frequent statistical test used in determining whether churning has occurred on an account is the “turnover ratio. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:57 am
Under both Oregon’s right-to-control and economic-realities tests, then, the drivers were “employees,” the appeals court held. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:30 am
” The agreement goes on to state that an employee “will be subject to termination” for a positive test result…” The plaintiffs in the case are a total of ten officers who submitted hair samples, tested positive for cocaine, and were terminated as a result. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:59 am
Sports Authority, Inc., wherein the Third District Court of Appeals decided as a general rule that plaintiffs should at least be able to recover medical expenses for diagnostic testing reasonably necessary to determine whether an accident caused injury. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
Unable to practice law because of his alienage, Sei Fujii became a plaintiff. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:31 pm
Specifically, the plaintiff failed to plead with particularity that a majority of the directors of Capital One faced a substantial likelihood of liability. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
In that instance, the judge issued an order for Goodyear to hand over all testing related to the tire and contained within that testing was the heat stress tests sought by the plaintiffs in the Haeger case. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Whatever testing they may have performed, it conceivably was not rigorous enough to have discovered the problem before it had a chance to cause injuries. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
While some courts tend to apply an objective test in determining foreseeability, other courts require a subjective showing that the particular damages were actually within the contemplation of the parties. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:24 am
Estate of Annie Mae Gully, October 20, 2016, Mississippi Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Eye Test as Means to Test for Concussion and Brain Injury, July 23, 2016, Boston Nursing Home Injury Lawyer The post Cleveland Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 7:06 am
” Thus, competitors could make table lamps with other human figures as bases; they could not, however, copy the particular sculptural work created by the plaintiff in Mazer. [read post]
