Search for: "United States v. California" Results 8581 - 8600 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by Eric
 First, all governments are pro-censorship, and that certainly includes the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:28 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
After he was apprehended it was revealed that "Clark" was actually Christian Gerhartsreiter, a German immigrant that had come to the United States as a teenager and since then assumed many different fake identities, including that of Boston socialite "Clark Rockefeller." [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:28 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
After he was apprehended it was revealed that "Clark" was actually Christian Gerhartsreiter, a German immigrant that had come to the United States as a teenager and since then assumed many different fake identities, including that of Boston socialite "Clark Rockefeller." [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:06 pm by Jessica Mendelson
” The report includes the major export enforcement, trade secret theft, economic espionage, and embargo-related criminal prosecutions handled by the United States Department of Justice between January 2007 and December 2012. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:32 am
On the following day, March 27th, the Court will conduct hearings on the second case, United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
Jan. 2, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a claim for violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
§ 78u-4 (“Reform Act”), should be applied less rigorously in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:36 am by Jim Singer
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of California could, if upheld, significantly limit companies’ ability to transfer its proprietary software unless the company has obtained an assignment from each and every developer. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:02 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:49 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
The Supreme Court also indicated today that it will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Perry – constitutionality of California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage; also, question of standing to appeal Wednesday, March 27: 12-307 — United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Stevan Porter
the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that the United States Federal District Court for the Southern District of California abused its discretion when it refused to award a victorious patent plaintiff a permanent injunction where the patentee directly competes with the infringer. [read post]