Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 8581 - 8600 of 10,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
In my view, a far better answer to the government’s argument is that the mandate isn’t “proper” even if it is “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five part test recently outlined by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:00 pm by admin
On the other hand, freedom of speech and anonymity on the Internet are generally well-protected by our courts. 1995’s United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 10:30 am by Gene Takagi
” NY Times“It’s the last news anyone wants to hear: one year after the United States was slammed with its first wave of COVID-19—which was followed by even worse second and third waves—public health experts are worried that the country is headed for a fourth major spike. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The case that most represents the ability to produce protected health information is the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, C. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The case that most represents the ability to produce protected health information is the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am by Anita Davies
The United States Supreme Court is hearing an intriguing case this week about whether Congress can make it a crime to falsely claim having been awarded a military medal, in a case testing the reach of the Constitution’s free-speech protection. [read post]
31 May 2022, 8:31 am by jonathanturley
Support for this claim could be based on a  2019 study in the Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery that found that “Mass-shooting related homicides in the United States were reduced during the years of the federal assault weapons ban of 1994 to 2004”. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
He stated that it wasn't bad as he had expected, given the war-time circumstances: "We have 75 students, and we haven't had to admit any women. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]