Search for: "VI" Results 8581 - 8600 of 13,327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 9:12 am
Representantes do município, por sua vez, afirmam que a cobrança só seria viável se fosse dada ao residente no município a possibilidade de trafegar em uma via alternativa à rodovia federal. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 7:41 am by Mike Inman
  FHA and VA regulations also do not allow the association’s governing documents to:  (i) require an association form lease or addendum; (ii) approve or “vet” tenants – not even a tenant’s credit worthiness; (iii) require that a unit owner occupy his unit for any period of time before being allowed to lease the unit; (iv) allow minimum lease terms less than thirty (30) days; (v) require age restrictions (other than that the tenant be over the age of 18) unless… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:22 am by Douglas Reiser
The USGBC points out that the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) office at the DOE would lose over 35% of its budget; the Energy Star program at the EPA would lose $10 Million in funding; and the Hope VI program at HUD would suffer a massive budget loss. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Amrit Singh
Also, in order to see whether applicant’s use of the mark is likely to cause dilution by blurring, the Board took the six factors enumerated in Section 1125(c)(2)(B)(i-vi) into consideration. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:09 pm
  As early as 1354 Parliament passed an act stating that "no Man of what Estate or Condition that he be" shall be imprisoned, dispossessed or executed "without being brought in Answer by due Process of the Law".The phrase "privileges and immunities" isn't quite so ancient, but it's already suggested by the 1606 Charter of Virginia, in which King James I (of England) & VI (of Scotland), affixing his seal during… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:58 pm by FDABlog HPM
  The Roxane and Apotex motions challeged FDA’s March 26, 2010 letter decision in which the Agency reluctantly concluded  that Teva did not forfeit 180-day exclusivity eligibility under FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(i)(VI), which states that 180-day exclusivity eligibility is forfeited if “[a]ll of the patents as to which the applicant submitted a certification qualifying it for the 180-day exclusivity period have expired. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:48 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
Assim, o produto seria incluído na imunidade tributária da importação de livros, jornais, periódicos e papel destinado a sua impressão, prevista na Constituição Federal, no artigo 150, inciso VI, alínea “d”. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 8:41 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
  However, the Guidance clarifies that the term “salary” does not include: (i) health, life, or other employer-provided insurance; (ii) paid or unpaid time off work, such as paid sick or vacation days, leaves of absence, or sabbaticals; (iii) the availability of or contributions towards retirement or savings funds; (iv) severance pay; (v) overtime pay; or (vi) other forms of compensation, such as commissions, tips, bonuses, stock, or the value of employer-provided meals or… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In addition, Family Court Act § 262 (a) (vi) provides an express statutory right to counsel for any person in a proceeding "in which an order or other determination is being sought to hold such person . . . in willful violation of a previous order of the court. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:45 pm by Béligh Elbalti
In addition, Egypt’s religious courts vied for jurisdiction over personal status disputes involving non-Muslims, further complicating the legal landscape. [read post]
6 May 2019, 3:18 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
El segundo chofer, que manejaba un Toyota Camry 2010, no vió a la Tacoma ni al LeSabre. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
If this doesn't work, it's probably because you have disabled the 'pop-up' facility -- try again, holding down the 'Ctrl' key; (vi) if you're writing to discuss an item that has been posted, check which team member has written it -- you may be emailing the wrong Kat -- and give a clue as to which post you're writing about (there are more than 4,700 articles on the IPKat and he has the memory of ... a cat). [read post]
Background Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) filed separate lawsuits against Harvard and UNC, arguing the universities’ race-based admissions programs violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:03 am by SHG
As Shakespeare’s Dick the Butcher said in Henry VI, the first thing needed to end the rule of law is to “kill all the lawyers. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:56 am
  The Bankruptcy Code defines an “insider” of a corporation as a “(i) director of the debtor; (ii) officer of the debtor; (iii) person in control of the debtor; (iv) partnership in which the debtor is a general partner; (v) general partner of the debtor; or (vi) relative of a general partner, director, officer, or person in control of the debtor. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
  (Snapple now produces its product without high fructose corn syrup.)Preemption is a legal doctrine based in Article VI, Section 2 of the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
  The other charges might spark some debate, however, as they include terrorism (Charge IV), material support to an act of terrorism in the form of providing advice, training, and planning in support of the attack (Charge V), spying in preparation for the attack (Charge VI), and conspiracy (Charge IX). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 2:05 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
” Mayor Vi Lyles acknowledged the health care providers who “did all that was possible. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 11:06 pm by dirceusr
Quem for ao evento, atenção com o doutrinamento das visões que costumamos chamar de “oficiais”. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
The basis for the preliminary injunction were: a First Amendment challenge to the hours-of-operation and beach-drinking ordinances (Counts III and VI); a Dormant Commerce Clause challenge to the Spring Break Ordinances (Count IV); an Equal Protection challenge to the Spring Break Ordinances (Count V); and a state-law land-use-planning challenges to the beach-drinking ordinance (Counts XI–XIV). [read post]