Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 8601 - 8620 of 17,269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2015, 9:04 am by Michael Froomkin
If I’m reading the election info page correctly, today is the last day to qualify, so unless someone else files today, this is the full field. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:18 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
PatCon V will be April 10-11 at Kansas.Here are some other large academic conferences that often have IP-specific panels or significant overlap with folks interested in IP. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:29 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court will hear oral argument March 23 in the case of Walker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:16 pm by Hannah Kiddoo
He added that one way to ensure that only the guilty are convicted is to uphold the promise of Gideon v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:39 am by Kate Fort
NICWA’s own ICWA expert Addie Smith, Kate Fort from the ILPC, and other leaders in the field of federal Indian law will be in attendance. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The difficulties of demonstrating actual damage are, as Warby J said in Ames, well known to practitioners in this field. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm by Andrew Frisch
SFBSC’s contention that the business of nude and semi-nude dancing “simply does not fall within” the field of “sexuality” (ECF No. 19 at 5) is unconvincing. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:34 am by Michelle O'Neil
PCCare247 Inc. and the Eastern District of Virginia in Whoshere, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:17 am by Steven M. Taber
  However, the legal landscape with respect to this aspect may have changed a bit with the decision in Helicopter Association International v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
<> The Most Ambitious Environmental Lawsuit Ever - A quixotic historian tries to hold oil and gas companies responsible for Louisiana's disappearing coast -- Each hour, Louisiana loses about a football field's worth of land. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
See HH Judge Parkes QC in Donovan v Gibbons [2014] EWHC 3406 (QB) at [6] and Warby J in Ames v Spamhaus Project Ltd [2015] EWHC 127 (QB) at [55]: “….there may be circumstances in which one would naturally expect to see tangible evidence that a statement had caused harm to reputation, but as practitioners in this field are well aware, it is generally impractical for a claimant to seek out witnesses to say that they read the words complained of and thought the… [read post]