Search for: "High v State" Results 8601 - 8620 of 35,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2019, 8:30 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
This has included a $280 million settlement in United States of America ex rel Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Nicklin in Craig Wright v Roger Ver ([2019] EWHC 2094 (QB)) confirms the high hurdle that a claimant must overcome in a defamation case where section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 applies. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Grace Gale
To illustrate the common law approach, Koopman points to Bukton v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am by Rachel Brown, Preston Lim
The processor uses RISC-V instruction set architecture--open-source design that allows developers to build products “with few intellectual property restrictions. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:02 am by Kristian Soltes
Rakuten, on Friday, announced that it would seek regulatory approval to obtain an industrial bank charter in the state of Utah. [read post]
Although these first two suits are against big hotel companies, they are just at the top of the pyramid and provide high-profile examples of targets for plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am by Ben
The only criticism which has been drawn however has been upon the unappealable nature of this tribunal and the high amount of $30,000 being involved as a punitive power. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
Katfriend Akanshha Agrawal reports on the first dynamic website blocking order issued by the Delhi High Court. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
The attorneys fees seem high, with five lawyers spending more than 11 hours filing forms, but courts cannot disregard claims that are presented under oath and only look unreasonable. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]