Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 12,723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Neither of these options requires significant re-evaluation of any Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:59 am
The opinion, delivered by Judge Margaret A. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 12:23 pm
Justice Mundy’s opinion properly begins with the requirement of standing in all cases; “a substantial, direct and immediate interest” in the subject matter. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm
Supporting his position was the formal opinion of the American Bar Association, issued in 2006. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
According to Justice Kennedy, the Court is re-embracing the principle that a speaker’s corporate identity is not a sufficient basis for suppressing political speech, as held in pre–Austin cases. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:40 am
Two justices, Cupp and O’Connor, reluctantly concur in the opinion, on the basis that Winn is now the law and they’re obligated to follow it based on stare decisis. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court justices. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 4:50 pm
” Bowers marked progress in the sense that four justices did vote to overturn the Georgia sodomy law (and a fifth, Justice Powell, later said he’d probably made a mistake voting to uphold the law). [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
And we all know that contract rights that are taken are, for the most part, frustrated expectancies, not a compensable property interest.Read Justice Prosser's dissent for a more cogent deconstruction of the majority's opinion than we can make. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am
Whenever Justice Sonia Sotomayor writes the Court’s opinion, a defendant wins. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
MercExchange opinion. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
As I mentioned when I discussed the opinion, Roberts’ opinion for the majority was essentially a rant about the costs of the exclusionary rule: To trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningfully deter it, and sufficiently culpable that such deterrence is worth the price paid by the justice system. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
The article analyzes the opinions in light of insights gathered while the author attended the oral arguments, and also addresses the Court of Appeal's opinion in Pfizer. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 12:10 pm
After re-reading the Tinker opinion countless times this Term, I can find nothing to suggest that the Court would have struck down the school's effort to discipline those students for interrupting classes, even though the interruption encompassed political speech. [read post]
18 May 2021, 3:23 am
The opinion by Justice Kavanaugh called it out. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:11 pm
They're mandatory, unless the government is seeking an injunction. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
In a fractured opinion written by Chief Justice O’Connor, in which Justices O’Donnell and Kennedy concurred in judgment only and Justice Pfeifer dissented, the court held that the foreseeability instruction given in this medical negligence case should not have been given, but was not prejudicial error, and reversed the court of appeals on this point. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:45 am
The Justice Department has lost the room. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:04 am
The justices have been under pressure from Congress in recent years to allow video and audio access to the Court's proceedings.W.Va. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:42 am
You’re not a slave, are you? [read post]
