Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 21,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 8:59 am
According to recent news report form Gossip Extra, Ross and his mother are being sued as co-defendants for an alleged slip and fall injury that occurred in his mother’s Florida home. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:21 am
In these situations, having the bar as a defendant likely means we are dealing with a company that has a much higher level of insurance to cover their employee’s negligence, cash and other assets that can pay a judgement. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 2:32 am
Accordingly, defendants cannot be liable for any losses suffered by the corporation (see Griffin v Anslow, 17 AD3d 889, 892 [2005]; C.K. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:20 pm
And the Plaintiff may also rely upon ERISA Section 502(a)(2) for a Defendant’s breaches of fiduciary duties. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 11:32 am
Ayala’s family is holding him liable for his daughter’s actions. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:48 am
Cases against nursing homes are often hard-fought because of the significant liability that may be incurred on the nursing home’s part if it is found liable for your loved one’s injuries or death. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:14 pm
Therefore, the private copying exception would not apply and, lacking a licence, ZEEZEE would be liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:24 pm
If the accident is outside of the defendant’s set of duties, or they don’t have a duty at all, the accused most likely isn’t liable for the injuries. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:09 am
Defendants cannot he held liable for such conduct. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:36 am
The original complaint by Ekbatani also named the driver’s employer as a defendant, but that claim was later dismissed when the two parties settled out-of-court. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:19 am
” Therefore, held the court, defendants are “liable for copyright infringement unless they can establish an affirmative defense to their usage. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Drown, No. 07-10374 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action by a prisoner, judgment for Defendant-Officers is reversed where Correction Law section 24, as applied to Section 1983 claims, violates the Supremacy Clause, because New York's policy of shielding correctional officers from liability for conduct performed in the scope of their employment is contrary to Congress's judgment that all persons who violate federal rights while acting under color of state law shall… [read post]
Pre-Suit Notice Requirement in Florida Medical Malpractice Cases - King v. Baptist Hospital of Miami
30 Jun 2012, 10:09 am
Thompson's negligence. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:25 am
Drown, No. 07-10374 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action by a prisoner, judgment for Defendant-Officers is reversed where Correction Law section 24, as applied to Section 1983 claims, violates the Supremacy Clause, because New York's policy of shielding correctional officers from liability for conduct performed in the scope of their employment is contrary to Congress's judgment that all persons who violate federal rights while acting under color of state law shall… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:22 pm
In Cahalane, Plaintiff engaged Defendant’s services to go on a tandem skydive jump. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:58 am
In rejecting the Defendant’s argument the Court provided the following sensible reasons: [87] Once the plaintiff establishes that the defendant is liable for his injuries, the burden shifts to the defendant. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:19 pm
Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the negligence claim, arguing that Gatti could not be held liable because he was the victim, not the aggressor, in the altercation. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:07 am
This ruling deals only with bodybuilding.com's liability. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:17 pm
Specifically, the Court noted that “regardless of whether corporate entities can be held liable in a federal common-law action brought under [the ATS]” (as questioned in Kiobel), the ATS “offers no comparative value” for interpreting the TVPA’s use of “individual” because nowhere in the ATS is “individual” used to describe potential defendants. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:53 pm
So, Mr Ghoppee was found personally liable for the costs of this case. [read post]
