Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 8601 - 8620 of 9,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2018, 1:50 pm by John Floyd
  Border Searches of Electronic Devices   The law is clear: the Supreme Court in 1977 in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:10 am by SHG
This got me thinking of Alexis de Tocqueville, who famously said that “[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court questions whether lawyers, of which the United States has no shortage, provide more social utility than scientists, engineers, and inventors. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles currently handle up to 64% of all West Coast oceanic shipping, and 35% of all such shipping in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
  Click to read the full court opinion State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
The third page of the plaintiff's complaint is missing from the documents the defendant offers in support of its motion. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]