Search for: "People, Inc." Results 8601 - 8620 of 23,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm by Bona Law PC
Author: Jarod Bona In an antitrust case deciding a non-antitrust-specific issue, the US Supreme Court held in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:37 am by Eric
Trusted Universal Standards in Electronic Transactions, Inc., 2010 WL 1799456 (D.N.J. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:59 am by SHG
Via Turley, the EEOC has charged Wisconsin Plastics, Inc., with discriminating against Hmong and Hispanics in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for firing employees for not speaking English in the workplace. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:17 am by Sheppard Mullin
In certain circumstances business people, after receiving in person training, should be expected to lead subsequent trainings in their offices. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:00 pm by Linda C. Severin
When companies violate the federal health care laws that are meant to protect patients, health care costs for hard working people increase. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Joe Mullin
Most people believe true innovators deserve compensation, and understand that patents can help them get it. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:22 pm by News Desk
Salmonella is an organism that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and those with weakened immune systems. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:15 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Anderson, Founder & President, The Courage Group, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 8:37 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
., Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
And here's Part I, which argues that authors have long based characters on real people, and have a constitutional right to do so: Creators have long worked real famous people into their fictional stories, and they have a First Amendment right to do so. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Michael Broyde
Take, for example, the 1999 case of Encore Productions, Inc. v. [read post]