Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 178,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2012, 7:26 am
Among other things, plaintiff alleged that defendant breached plaintiff’s online terms of service, violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and was unjustly enriched by copying and “scraping” course catalog information from plaintiff’s service and using that collected data to populate defendant’s own database. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:26 am
The court rejected the plaintiff’s claim against the landlord based on the plaintiff’s failure to show that the landlord’s failure to repair the gate was the legal cause of her injuries. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
Prior to seeking formal discovery of Plaintiff’s social networking accounts, Defendant obtained wall posts and photos from Plaintiff’s public Facebook profile that “provid[ed] evidence of Plaintiff’s post-accident social activities, mental state, relationship history, living arrangements, and rehabilitative progress” which were relevant to the claims and defenses in the case. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 6:05 am
Plaintiff’s class action alleged the FedEx delivery drivers were misclassified as “independent contractors.” Hart, at 676. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 6:28 am
The web page of the Rhode Island Supreme Court has a summary of a recent decision in a legal malpractice case The pro se plaintiff in this appeal, Artecia Behroozi (plaintiff or Behroozi), appealed from the Superior Court’s entry of... [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:15 pm
In an accident case involving an injured motorcyclist, the defendant City of Tampa made a number of objections at trial concerning the behavior of the plaintiff's attorney. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:54 am
The court's opinion is here: Download Kipnis - Memorandum re MTD This decision does not mean that, at trial, the plaintiff will prevail on these claims, but it does mean that the... [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 4:17 pm
In Taylor, the Supreme Court rejected the virtual-representation doctrine in the preclusion context and remanded for the lower court to determine whether plaintiff's suit was barred under established preclusion principles. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:11 am
The Fifth Circuit ruled that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge a Mississippi town's decision to fly the state flag over city hall as a violation of the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Six plaintiffs have filed a complaint in a San Francisco, California state court seeking clarification of the state's assisted suicide statute and an injunction against prosecution of the plaintiffs if they seek or provide medication to end the life of... [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:17 am
Kirk Hartley thinks he knows one reason "why asbestos plaintiff's lawyers presently are spending so much time and energy trying to limit the time allowed for depositions of asbestos plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 12:51 pm
Plaintiff insisted on counsel's presence at the exam and authority to... [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:29 am
See Plaintiffs’ MSJ motion DOJ MSJ motion Plaintiffs’ reply [corrected link] DOJ’s reply is to come. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:05 am
A Massachusetts pediatrician pseudonymously blogged a malpractice trial, spicing up his commentary with jabs at the plaintiff, plaintiff's attorney, and even the jury. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 5:00 pm
Key Insight: Plaintiff was discovered to have fabricated emails. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:08 am
A jury found in favor of plaintiff’s claims of infringement; however, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law because plaintiff had not offered the “source code” for the software games at issue into evidence during the trial. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
The plaintiff - who sustained head injuries after an MRI machine exploded and knocked him to the ground - was excluded from trial based on the defense's request. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:49 pm
This seems like a relatively simple matter but it is not always real clear what caused a plaintiff's injuries. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:38 am
In considering Round Rock's motion to compel non-infringement contentions, the district court noted that the plaintiff requested a response to its interrogatory seeking Dell's non-infringement contentions. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:38 am
The complex’s main defense was that the plaintiff knew of the hazard, and that it was open and obvious. [read post]
