Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 121,943
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2022, 6:10 am
(3taps, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:45 am
Do you see the difference in the language? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:22 am
“An attorney holding funds in escrow owes a fiduciary duty to anyone with a beneficial interest in the trust” (Baquerizo v Monasterio, 90 AD3d 587, 587 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Levit v Allstate Ins. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am
For California law pertaining to online safety and privacy as it relates to children under 18, please also see the article California’s Landmark Age-Appropriate Design Code Act: What You Need to Know. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am
" Nothing to see here, right? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
See Rowan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
" * The Retirement and Social Security Law defines an "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" [See Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873] ** Petitioner testified that, as part of his standard duties as a firefighter, he engaged in training exercises at the training center several times a year that included live-fire search and rescue operation drills where controlled fires were set, reducing visibility to zero. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
" * The Retirement and Social Security Law defines an "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" [See Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873] ** Petitioner testified that, as part of his standard duties as a firefighter, he engaged in training exercises at the training center several times a year that included live-fire search and rescue operation drills where controlled fires were set, reducing visibility to zero. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
" * The Retirement and Social Security Law defines an "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" [See Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873] ** Petitioner testified that, as part of his standard duties as a firefighter, he engaged in training exercises at the training center several times a year that included live-fire search and rescue operation drills where controlled fires were set, reducing visibility to zero. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
" * The Retirement and Social Security Law defines an "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact" [See Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873] ** Petitioner testified that, as part of his standard duties as a firefighter, he engaged in training exercises at the training center several times a year that included live-fire search and rescue operation drills where controlled fires were set, reducing visibility to zero. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
See California v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
However, according to Reuters, Trump has little interest in returning to Twitter, responding “I don’t see any reason for it. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:56 am
See Announcement. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 pm
Noonan -- Last week, IP Law360 published an erudite and provocative article by Joseph Matal and his colleagues regarding the Supreme Court's recent subject matter jurisprudence in the context of earlier decisions in the 19th and early 20th Centuries (see "How Mayo V. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
”Camus’s argument that the more people know about capital punishment the less they support it entered American jurisprudence in Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
Harper see this earlier Verdict essay. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:38 am
YR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Lambeth (2022) EWHC 2813 (Admin) Ms YR had applied to Lambeth as homeless. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 7:01 am
The website has been shut down several times and its domains confiscated, forcing it to continue operating under a series of new web addresses.As most copyright aficionados will recall, the website was also the protagonist of one of the most important judgments of the CJEU in relation to acts of communication to the public of protected works by the operator of a website - Stichting Brein v Ziggo, in Case C-610/15 (which we reported on at the time - see here). [read post]
