Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 8601 - 8620
of 13,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
& C. 4th 251, 257 (2003), or that the TV program Born Innocent led some underage viewers to sexually attack a small child in copying a scene shown on the program, Olivia N. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 10:40 am
The 2010 Court of Quebec case of Kyle c. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:20 pm
(c)(2). [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
Nikolaeva v London Borough of Redbridge (2020) EWCA Civ 1586 A quick note on this Court of Appeal decision concerning offers of permanent accommodation in discharge of duty. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm
The case, entitled D.A. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:00 am
In the recent case of Love v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
He states that “unexplained delays … should be taken into account. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:14 pm
C. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:09 pm
Sandra O'Neill v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 11:37 am
” Jessica C. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 11:37 am
” Jessica C. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
And here’s one application of the law, from Thomas v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 1:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:41 am
Cir. 2008) (stating that “plaintiffs do not bear the burden of showing an impact on price” at the class certification stage); b) Schleicher v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Toomey, citing School District 6 v NYSHRB, 35 NY2d 371, said that such a personnel policy, even if the product of negotiations under [the Taylor Law] would violate the State’s Human Rights Law and is therefore a prohibited subject of negotiations.* See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:16 pm
V The paragraph 9th, S Trust, is a discretionary trust. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Elonis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Part V (Sections 76 - 78) of the Irish Patents Act 1992 (as amended) permits the use of inventions "for the service of the State". [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Monday’s ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
