Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 27,496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 5:21 am
In Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 9:20 am
All rise for the CC...Justice Brandeis’s concurrence in Ashwander v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
(Termination of parental rights; ("This certified appeal raises important issues concerning the review of unpreserved claims under State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:09 am
The experts agreed that horse racing in Michigan was dead, however, Abundance Star, a Pennsylvania Horse, could race in that state where gaming was state sponsored. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:08 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:30 am
Plaintiffs claims include ones of unjust enrichment and violation of the state's Fair Business Practice Act. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:20 pm
For instance, in S.H. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:23 am
The Fashion Law reported on a recent US case - involving Tom Ford lipstick, a photo on Cardi B's Instagram, XXL magazine, and the photographer who originally took the photo - in which the matter was determined to be fair use.PatentsThe CJEU's judgment in Case C-673/18 Santen to abolish SPCs for new therapeutic applications, following the Advocate General's recommendation to reverse its prior finding in Case C-130/11 Neurim, has attracted significant commentary,… [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am
In Venezuela v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
For example, in State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:27 am
Schatz's profile stated that he `would like to find a nice boy to chill with. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:49 pm
His commentary on Epic v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
” To hold otherwise, the appellate court stated, would be to recognize, contrary to public policy favoring settlement and fair dealing, that the husband was entitled to a “fair” opportunity to stall in settling the action with the goal of retaining all of the marital assets upon the wife’s death. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
This question was addressed in the decision of PECO Logistics, LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari in First American Financial Corporation v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:57 am
In Williams v. [read post]
