Search for: "State v. Money" Results 8601 - 8620 of 20,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2018, 6:11 pm by Lou M
"The fact that other male employees performed substantially identical work but made less money than the plaintiffs did not affect the outcome. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:45 am by Jeremy
This morning the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-435/12 ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie, Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:36 pm
The case is Curators of the University of Missouri v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:33 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
Last year, Judge Mark Bernstein in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas had a long, scholarly analysis of the state of privilege law in the Kolar v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Where the issue is not the restitution of money received by the state but the provision by the state of a financial benefit (i.e. the payment of credits in relation to taxes paid to another state as in this case), the remedy has to be tailored to the wrong committed in breach of EU law. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Amy Howe
The panel ordered the state to draw a new map. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "The complaint states discrete causes of action for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and fraud or misrepresentation (or, more accurately, fraudulent omission of a material fact). [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 5:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As relevant to the instant motion, on July 2, 2001, the New York City Civil Court granted Perlberger a $37,043.75 money judgment against plaitniff in the action entitled Perlberger v Lutin, Index No. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  These actions impose very high costs, whether measured in terms of lives lost or money spent, and so cause a cost-benefit collective-action problem. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
McIlrath, No. 07-1266 Sentence for traveling across state lines to have sex with a minor is affirmed where: 1) remarks of the judge at sentencing discharged his duty to consider not only the sentencing guidelines, but [read post]