Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 13,226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
KALTENBACHER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 11:02 am
Lebowitz v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 1:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:39 pm
The move is not a surprise - FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz predicted the case, FTC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm
Plaintiff relied heavily on Krueger v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:14 am
The United States Supreme Court issued a patent opinion this week in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:14 am
The United States Supreme Court issued a patent opinion this week in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
There should not be much mystery why the price was high. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
TITLE V–GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Sec. 501. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:43 am
Regina (FDA and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and another: [2012] EWCA Civ 332; [2012] WLR (D) 95 “The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was entitled to use the Consumer Price Index, rather than the Retail Price Index, as the measure of consumer price inflation for the purpose of annually uprating public service pensions under section 150 of the Social Security Administration Act… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:24 pm
By identifying the alleged misrepresentation as being located on the product packaging and alleging that they relied on this statement in purchasing and paying a premium price for the contaminated formula, the purchasers asserted the requisite causal connection between the deceptive act and their injuries.RecallA recall program did not render the claims under the New York and New Hampshire statutes moot, according to the court. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
The Court granted leave to appeal in Price v High Pointe Oil Co, asking the parties to brief whether mental distress damages may be awarded for negligent damage to real property. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:03 am
The decision in Coleman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Keating, in which North Carolina's Business Court dismissed a claim because the alleged trade secrets — customer lists, customer contract information, pricing information and product information – were pled too generally to state a claim for misappropriation. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
That, as Mr Price QC for Sergeant Flood was at pains to point out, would indeed be a “charter for malice”. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:20 am
By Nicole KilloranMolleur v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:40 pm
., LC, v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:29 pm
This unanimous decision in Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
That, as Mr Price QC for Sergeant Flood was at pains to point out, would indeed be a “charter for malice”. [read post]
