Search for: "State v. Settle" Results 8601 - 8620 of 15,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 7:11 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Nutrafruit brought infringement actions against some Australian growers in 2021 and 2024, but both cases settled before trial. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm by David Oscar Markus
From the government's press release:According to the complaint filed in federal court today, Campagna was a sworn trial juror in the federal criminal case of United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:58 am by Rachel Sandler
Tuesday’s decision in Oil States Energy Services v Greene’s Energy Group (Oil States), Supreme Court Docket No. 16–712, argued November 27, 2017 — decided April 24, 2018, provides guidance and stability to a patent review process in which billions of dollars are at stake. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by Dan Hoerner
A recent First Circuit Court of Appeals case out of Massachusetts (Cracchiolo v. [read post]