Search for: "State v. So "
Results 8601 - 8620
of 116,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In the same way that Collins is undermined by the subequent decisions in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015), so Murphy is undermined by the subsequent decisions in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) and Case… [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:43 pm
” Woldridge, 958 So. 2d at 458 (citing State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:14 am
” The Labour Appeal Court then went on to cite the Edcon v Pillemer judgment stating that: “It is however always better if such evidence is led by people who are in a position to testify to such breakdown. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:32 am
So does Rivera get a new trial? [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 3:07 am
Scott v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:05 pm
Josh Blackman, who was present at this morning's oral argument, prefaces his analysis by stating -The Court was not at all receptive to arguments on Privileges or Immunities but incorporation on Due Process is a slam dunk.Meanwhile, SCOTUSblog says - The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed poised to require state and local governments to obey the Second Amendment guarantee of a personal right to a gun, but with perhaps considerable authority to regulate that right. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:15 pm
This is a state law issue. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
” Of these decisions, one—Hughes v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm
(See, e.g., US v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:00 pm
I’m worried about the future of Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:00 am
” Rossignol, 316 F.3d at 521 (quoting McIntyre v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:51 pm
Code,1 §§ 503, 508) following a jury trial and sentenced to state prison. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Holley has stated that no established religion adequately describes his religious beliefs. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
In Soledispa v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:41 am
If such an order were issued, Texas would become the first state to be subject to preclearance in the post-Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
Under Buckman, private plaintiffs cannot pursue state law claims related to those sorts of alleged violations.That interpretation (though it's a little hard to express) is the best way to reconcile Buckman and Riegel, so it must be right.And that reading makes clear that Riegel's exception for parallel state law claims is not an exception that swallows the rule. [read post]
