Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 55,073
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am
Souza v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:26 am
Kolbe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
Jim Adler runs a personal injury law firm that claims trademarks in JIM ADLER, THE HAMMER, TEXAS HAMMER, and EL MARTILLO TEJANO. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 8:08 am
DESAI (UW Law) In Bostock v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 7:15 am
In Tiger Lily v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:26 am
The en banc ruling produced passionate dissenting opinions from three Circuit judges, one of whom suggested the search was actually motivated.The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:22 am
The two cases are Holmes v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 4:18 pm
”] From Yukutake v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 7:11 am
In Bostock was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, and Title VII, forthcoming in the Notre Dame Law Review and available on SSRN, Mitchell Berman and Guha Krishnamurthi argue that Bostock v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:49 am
Similarly, in IS v JW, 2021 ONSC 1194, the vaccination of a six-year-old child was at issue. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm
It is axiomatic that nobody should be above the law, and perhaps equally accepted that law enforcement is a necessary component for ensuring adherence to the law. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 6:31 pm
This past week, the California Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:36 am
Nunes v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:32 pm
” Locasto v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 9:13 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
” People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 12:00 am
Trade marksGuestKat Nedim Malovic considered the meaning of bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation, following the EU General Court's decision in Riviera-Airport v EUIPO.Also in the EU vein, InternKat Anastasiia Kyrylenko reported on the Opinion issued by Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe in Case C-123/20, which relates to the protectability of ‘partial designs’ as an unregistered Community design right.Asia Correspondent… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
Police are supposed to good reason to arrest people. [read post]
