Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 8601 - 8620 of 51,308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
It was essentially uncontroverted that the employee was frequently absent or late, he lied about his attendance, and he used work time to play games or conduct personal business. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:18 pm by ligitsec
Public performances are exempt, if they are given “without any purpose of . . . commercial advantage and without payment of any fee . . . for the performance” — as long as there is no admission charge. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:18 pm by ligitsec
Public performances are exempt, if they are given “without any purpose of . . . commercial advantage and without payment of any fee . . . for the performance” — as long as there is no admission charge. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:43 pm by MacIsaac
In last week’s case (Anderson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm by Mara Curtis and Michael Kleinmann
California companies have been required to reconsider their use of independent contractors since the state’s Supreme Court outlined the new ABC test in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 3:12 pm
This is a timely reminder to us all that such an approach simply will not do. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
  Under § 8316, any natural person whose name or likeness has commercial value and is used for any commercial or advertising purpose without the written consent of such natural person ... may bring an action to enjoin such unauthorized use and to recover damages for any loss or injury sustained by such use. [read post]