Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 51,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 5:35 am
In Wittmer v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:50 am
It was essentially uncontroverted that the employee was frequently absent or late, he lied about his attendance, and he used work time to play games or conduct personal business. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
(This was the technique successfully used by the plaintiff in Bosh v. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 9:13 pm
”)Minges Creek, L.L.C. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
Cir. cases analyzing Bilski v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:18 pm
Public performances are exempt, if they are given “without any purpose of . . . commercial advantage and without payment of any fee . . . for the performance” — as long as there is no admission charge. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:18 pm
Public performances are exempt, if they are given “without any purpose of . . . commercial advantage and without payment of any fee . . . for the performance” — as long as there is no admission charge. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
* Corbis Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
In McPadden v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:43 pm
In last week’s case (Anderson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm
California companies have been required to reconsider their use of independent contractors since the state’s Supreme Court outlined the new ABC test in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 3:12 pm
This is a timely reminder to us all that such an approach simply will not do. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:48 pm
In People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
[FN1] In sum, because the employment agreements appear to have given petition [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
[FN1] In sum, because the employment agreements appear to have given petition [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Under § 8316, any natural person whose name or likeness has commercial value and is used for any commercial or advertising purpose without the written consent of such natural person ... may bring an action to enjoin such unauthorized use and to recover damages for any loss or injury sustained by such use. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:46 am
But, in Laster v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
As New York Times v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 5:44 am
That makes Bruesewitz v. [read post]