Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 9,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
United States (1963) 371 U.S. 471. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:21 am
Thus, Defendants will not bear the burden of translating live testimony in Martinique as both parties would in the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:17 pm
In Employment Div. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Under Sherbert v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:09 pm
New Jersey Jury Charges: In State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 12:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:04 am
More detail of Synthes (U.S.A.) v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (the Commission), a seven-member body that was established under DSHEA to "provide recommendations for...the regulation of label claims and statements for dietary supplements, including the use of literature in connection with the sale of dietary supplements and procedures for the evaluation of such claims," held public meetings around the United States from 1996 through 1997. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:20 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently reversed a District Court decision which denied a motion to suppress evidence seized without a warrant. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 1:18 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg The company Chief Financial Officer failed to meet his burden show the communications to outside counsel during the internal company investigation were "made in confidence" and protected by the attorney-client privilege; instead the communications were made "for the purpose of disclosure to the outside auditors" and therefore could be used by the government in the subsequent criminal prosecution, in United… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:07 pm
Arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus in support of affirmance, Michael Dreeben agreed with Mr. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:57 am
United States District Judge Steven V. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
In People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:11 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Many states have responded to this growing concern by enacting legislation restricting the association’s power to foreclose on property. [read post]
