Search for: "United States v. John" Results 8601 - 8620 of 11,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am by INFORRM
  The action arose from a program originally broadcast on August 15, 2004 (episode), Ali G interviewed Gore Vidal (Vidal) regarding the United States Constitution and Amendments thereto. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:23 am by jonathanturley
While the district court ruled against Wilson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed and found a violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court had been asked to consider a challenge to an insider trading conviction. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat)   United States  US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices will return to a familiar statute: the Armed Career Criminal Act, which imposes an enhanced sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm if the defendant has three convictions “committed on occasions different from one another. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Conor McEvily
Bullock, a case that might allow the Court to reconsider its decision two years ago in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which is scheduled for oral argument next Tuesday, maintaining that “there is no Double Jeopardy problem in this case” because “Bravo-Fernandez isn’t an inconsistent verdicts case at all. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:12 pm by Adam Wagner
In Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom the government boldly sought and failed to reverse the decision of the court’s Grand Chamber in Hirst No. 2. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am by Amy Howe
” The Hernandez family’s case implicates foreign relations, the court reasoned, because of the “legitimate and important interests” of both the United States and Mexico “that may be affected by the way in which this matter is handled. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am by David Pozen
  Last fall, President Trump announced he was preparing an executive order that would deny birthright citizenship to children born in the United States to parents unlawfully in the country, notwithstanding the Justice Department’s consistent stance that such a move would violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Guest Blogger
Indeed, reliance on intermediate scrutiny to do the work of the more traditional tests is manifest in such cases as United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use  in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:14 pm
The SCOTUS Blog has, as usual, the most concise summary about the case, Sprint/United Management v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]