Search for: "mark"
Results 8601 - 8620
of 136,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 1:45 pm
But it would also mean a higher proportion of higher marks, falling to smaller and small proportions of lower marks. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:57 pm
Press release: SAN JOSE, Calif., October 2, 2007â€â [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:39 am
The mark and the domain name are confusingly similar. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:08 am
An augmented TTAB panel of five judges affirmed (3-2) a Section 2(a) disparagement refusal to register the mark KHORAN for wines, concluding that "Muslims would find the mark KHORAN for wines as disparaging to themselves, their religions and their beliefs. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:36 am
-- There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics… [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 1:03 pm
“Construction law,” says Mark, “is business law on steroids! [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:52 am
However, also in this case, the GC stated that the reputation of the contested mark was irrelevant, and that reputation was relevant only in respect of the earlier mark (§ 145). [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 4:54 am
" However, it found that "opposer's mark possesses a degree of strength with a corresponding scope of protection that encompasses applicant's similar mark for similar services. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm
The TDRA defines ‘dilution by blurring’ as the ‘association arising from the similarity between a mark or a trade name and a famous mark that impairs the distinctiveness of the famous mark. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
Next the Board evaluated the similarities and the differences between the marks. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 1:03 pm
“Construction law,” says Mark, “is business law on steroids! [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 1:03 pm
“Construction law,” says Mark, “is business law on steroids! [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:16 am
Trilobite, in turn, asserted that Turdin was using his mark in other locations as well, where there is a likelihood of confusion with its mark. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 6:32 am
” The Board concluded that Blizzard’s activities under the marks constitute use of the marks that satisfies the requirement of the Trademark Act. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:46 am
The Board, however, observed that the applied-for mark "moves closer to the cited registration" than the mark in the prior registration. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:55 am
A later notice of cancellation, for the “DRX 9000” word mark, came after the entry of judgment, when the marks had been reassigned to Axiom. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:41 am
There surely should be some room for humour in trade mark law. [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:55 am
/Doctor marks, Dre marks, or Dr. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:26 pm
Although the Opinion (in French but not yet available in English) only addresses trade marks for medicinal products, the observations regarding trade mark use prior to regulatory approval will no doubt be of interest to other regulated industries as well. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 1:09 am
Genuine use and partial revocation remain challenging trade mark issues. [read post]
