Search for: "B. N. S."
Results 8621 - 8640
of 16,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2014, 1:12 am
Santiago también expresó que la reforma a la LPAU debe incluir cambios que conduzcan a remediar el poco acceso a la información que impera actualmente y señaló las malas experiencias que tienen muchas personas tratando de obtener documentos e información básica para poder participar en procesos. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 12:43 pm
[O]n December 27, 2012, University of Kentucky police officers found A.B. with maternal grandmother, who was wandering around outside on the university’s Lexington campus. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 12:06 pm
JUSTICE KAGAN: [N]otwithstanding what you said about 10 of 11 judges, it was clear that the judges thought that there was a real problem here in terms of an end run, and that they looked at this and said, well we could do it under 271(a) or we could do it under 271(b), and 271(b) seems a lot more natural and better for various reasons. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:42 pm
The Impact of US Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 7:15 pm
Chaganti [...] argues [(a)] that Glassman does not examine license information to determine [a number] N [of authorized concurrent users], as required by claim 48[; (b)] that Glassman does not disclose the step of receiving licensing information indicating that the license is for access of information for a predetermined time . . . as required by claim 49[; and (c)] that Glassman does not disclose the step of determining a time period [...] during which the copyright-protected… [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
Code § 230(e)(3) (`[N]o liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section’). [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:03 pm
[Blogger's note: For EB-5 stakeholders interested in learning more about the USCIS Listening Session, you can register for "EB-5 Immigrant Investor Update," a webinar presented by members of Seyfarth Shaw LLP's EB-5 Immigrant Investment Team on May 13, 2014. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:03 pm
[Blogger's note: For EB-5 stakeholders interested in learning more about the USCIS Listening Session, you can register for "EB-5 Immigrant Investor Update," a webinar presented by members of Seyfarth Shaw LLP's EB-5 Immigrant Investment Team on May 13, 2014. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 2:03 pm
[Blogger's note: For EB-5 stakeholders interested in learning more about the USCIS Listening Session, you can register for "EB-5 Immigrant Investor Update," a webinar presented by members of Seyfarth Shaw LLP's EB-5 Immigrant Investment Team on May 13, 2014. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Par contre, une nouvelle intubation pourrait s’avérer nécessaire. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:42 am
§2252A(a)(5)(B). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 10:29 am
Para B. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:54 pm
Jude now challenges, however, is the Director’s non-institution decision under section 314(a) & (b). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:47 pm
In Gilead’s view, the ’375 patent cannot serve as a double patenting reference against the ’483 patent because, even though the ’483 patent’s expiration date is twenty-two months after the ’375 patent’s expiration date, the ’375 patent issued after the ’483 patent. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
’” Id. at 2 n.4. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 8:10 pm
Isso significa dizer que a garantia, conceitualmente, por si só, não tem qualquer sentido satisfatório, sendo antes uma projeção do direito cuja tutela instrumentaliza (STF, MS 23452 / RJ – RIO DE JANEIRO, Rel. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
Lenahan, Esq.LENAHAN & DEMPSEY Scott B. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:26 am
In a footnote, the judge explains that “[b]ecause of the underlying criminal investigation, portions of the record, including the target’s identity, are sealed. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:02 pm
Los casados deben ser y serán sagrados el uno para el otro, aún más de lo que es cada uno para sí. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
Instead of looking at what the intent was going from point a to b to c, could the Court just apply the old fashioned standards, tried and true, benefit to employer, scope of employment and defer to the court on that? [read post]
