Search for: "David v. David" Results 8621 - 8640 of 19,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 6:26 am
David Easterling, No. 100,454 (Shawnee)Sentencing appealChristopher M. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
Alicia Mitchell n/k/a Alicia Zamarron - "It was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to reduce David's responsibility for spousal maintenance to $250 per month and to assign $1,500 of Alicia's attorney's fees to David. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Chairman of the Board of Cato Institute, Robert Levy. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
The judgment in David Miller v University of Bristol 1400780/2022, decided in February 2024, has been published. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 9:25 pm
In this breach of employment contract and misappropriation of trade secrets case, plaintiff moved to compel production of e-mails from defendant’s personal Yahoo! [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:09 am
 In fact, while sovereign coins from jurisdictions other than the United Kingdom commonly bear the word "sovereign", United Kingdom sovereigns hardly ever have, and RM's promotional material usually involves "the designation 'sovereign' [being] used in association with the name Royal Mint" (paragraph 34 of the Decision).Acquired distinctiveness could not come to the Royal Mint's rescue because although 'the vast majority' of coins in the UK came… [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 6 November 2015, Sir David Eady heard applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in Winkelman v. [read post]