Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 38,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
This was despite the fact that it permitted an intervention by the “Alliance Defending Freedom” an American conservative Christian nonprofit organization dealing with this issue (see [35] to [37]). [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 7:59 pm
Harris Associates both received a great deal of media attention this week. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:06 am
There are now at least six cases on CAAF’s Master Docket dealing with Melendez-Diaz’s application to drug testing reports. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:53 am
See Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:54 am
V. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 8:15 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
(People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:11 pm
(Hughes v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:11 pm
” (Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Back-room dealings were apparent. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
The designThe case concerned is Chen v OHMI - AM Denmark (Dispositif de nettoyage), T-55/12 of 25 April 2013 and can be retrieved here. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:39 am
Parents for Privacy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:10 pm
Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Following the Federal Court of Appeal’s warning to losing brands that they must put their best foot forward in case1[1], and at the same time, arguably permissive attitude regarding new generics in case2, the Federal Court continues to grapple with how to fairly deal with re-litigation. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:16 am
For more than twenty years, the case of Brown v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:09 pm
The use of this procedure was highlighted in a recent Human Rights Tribunal decision, Abdul v York University. [read post]
