Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 8621 - 8640 of 13,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2014, 4:48 pm
The order was to be effective from July 1, 1964 until August 29, 1964. [read post]
”[1] “Core State Preparedness Responsibilities” In addition to the gating criteria, the Federal Guidelines recommend that the state or region satisfy the following standards—referred to as “Core State Preparedness Responsibilities”—prior to implementing each of the three phases: Testing and Contact Tracing Ability to quickly set up “safe and efficient screening and testing sites” for symptomatic individuals, persons exposed to COVID-19,… [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 5:15 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Assistance eligible individuals generally are COBRA qualified beneficiaries who lost coverage under the group health plan due to an involuntary reduction in hours or termination of employment enrolled in COBRA Coverage between April 1, 2021 and September 31, 2021 including those qualifying event was an involuntary employment loss occurring during the 18-month period (29-months for individuals qualifying for extended COBRA eligibility due to disability) prior to April 1,… [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
” After being advised the 2008 project’s enclosed balconies would exceed the general plan’s allowable 6:1 floor area ratio (FAR) and thus require a variance, Millennium took no further action until submitting another project application for the site in 2011. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:49 pm by Peter J. Brown and Alexander Volberding
This bulletin is intended to provide a high-level summary of our current legal analysis[1] on this issue, including on the following subjects: (1) the permissibility of requiring COVID-19 vaccinations; (2) the exceptions to a vaccination requirement; and the (3) bargaining obligations related to requiring a vaccination. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
The district court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim, concluding that while FNHRA may establish federal standards of care, it does not provide a private right of action that may be enforced under Section 1983. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Inj. and Workers’ Comp. 2d § 6.04[4]; Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law, Ch. 5, § 5.05[1].] ■Hever Rivera Flores, Applicant v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Code of Ordinances §§ 29-1, -12(1)(c) (2022) (protecting "political affiliation"); Lansing (Mich.) [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm
– (1) xxx xxx xxx (2) xxx xxx xxx (3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm by Graham Purse
A tax system brings individual interests into conflict with collective interests.1 Should a person, therefore, have to subvert his own interest? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
§ 1395y(b)(3)(A) does not apply to MA Plans; (2) the secondary payer provisions of the Medicare Advantage program, (found in 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
§ 1395y(b)(3)(A) does not apply to MA Plans; (2) the secondary payer provisions of the Medicare Advantage program, (found in 42 U.S.C. [read post]