Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 9,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 1:06 am
§101 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:25 pm
Jun. 1, 2009) In this case, the district court (Eastern District of Texas) found several claims of the patent at issue invalid under the definiteness requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:30 pm
John DOE, writing under the name John David California; Windupbird Publishing Ltd.; Nicotext A.B.; and ABP, Inc. d/b/a SCB Distributors Inc., No. 09 Civ. 5095 DAB (June 1, 2009).Complaint available at Westlaw, 2009 WL 1615819 (S.D.N.Y).FORMER BEAUTY QUEEN SUES ICM FOR SEXUAL ASSAULTA former Canadian beauty queen has filed a class-action lawsuit accusing ICM of a conspiracy to sexually assault and exploit young actresses. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
" He wanted his claims directed to the Internet, so he filed for reissue, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:09 am
CJO 08-015 requires filing fees for the following trial motions and responses: (1) ORCP 21 motions to dismiss, make more definite and certain, strike, and quash (such ORCP 21 motions, filed jointly, in any combination, are subject to one fee); (2) ORCP 46 motions to compel discovery; (3) ORCP 47 motions for summary judgment; (4) ORCP 63 motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or reconsideration; (5) ORCP 64 motions for new trial or reconsideration; (6) Motions to reconsider… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
Uniguard Services Ltd. and Chahal (1986), 1 B.C.L.R. (2d) 309 (C.A.), for the proposition that the grounds for privilege have to be established in respect of each document which is said to be privileged. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:02 am
The issue on appeal was whether the asserted claims were fully enabled as required by 35 U.S.C. 112 ¶ 1. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:13 am
The opinion does not resolve the debate over the breadth of that power. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:00 am
There are no prerequisites for applying, and it does not require a business match. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:56 am
Art 35(1) needs to be amended to allow a defence to recognition/enforcement along the lines of section 32 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
Now the emails which were sent to me one hour and two minutes later on Friday, June 12th, at 4:35 p.m. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:51 pm
Super. 35, 40 (App. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 1:12 am
The 4th Circuit denied Dwight Whorley's rehearing in a 10-1 decision Monday. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:50 pm
Code § 35-43-2-1.5. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 11:20 am
The improvement limitation of claim 1 is thus in means-plus-function format, as permitted by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:15 am
Take a look.The BBC has a country by country analysis of the election results and we show below the fairly final but still officially provisional EU Election Results for all 27 Countries who elected 736 Members of Parliament (MEPs) representing 492 million European inhabitants (there are 375 million eligible voters):Provisional 11 June 2009 at 11:26 CEST EPP PES ALDE UEN GREENS/ EFA GUE/ NGL IND/ DEM Others Total BE 6 5 5 0 3 0 0 3… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:19 pm
Indiana Code § 35-42-4-9(a). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:28 pm
DOE must upgrade standards for products already regulated and add standards for outdoor lighting, other light fixtures, and more appliances. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:31 pm
Resurfice, 2007 SCC 7, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 333, at para. 21). [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
LillyTrackBack URL for Patent Docs post [Note Patent Docs does not list IPBiz in its PATENT BLOGS & SITES nor does IP WatchDog include IPBiz in its LINKS]**Observation on 12 June 09. [read post]
