Search for: "Grant v Grant"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 104,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2021, 12:49 pm
Crown Castle Fiber, LLC v City of Charleston, 2021 WL 538148 (D. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:46 pm
Tchenguiz v Bird, 2022 WL 519174 (D. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:15 am
Supreme Court has granted a petition for writ of certiorari to take up Rimini Street v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:15 pm
On August 30, a number of amicus briefs were filed in the FTC v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:44 am
Aldaba v Marta, 2022 WL 1641320 ( D. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
Ritzka) G 0002/21 Syngenta Ltd v Sumitomo Chemical Co. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
In last week’s Halo Elecs. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:04 pm
” Id., at 5 (quoting City of San Jose v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 7:30 am
Goode v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court found that it has long recognized the grant of a patent as a matter involving public rights, citing to the Court’s 1899 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Wood v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
The Supreme Court of Canada today issued a pair of RCMP-related rulings that, on the one hand, open the door to meaningful collective bargaining rights for officers, while simultaneously affirming the right of government to restrict officers’ wages unilaterally.In the first case, Mounted Police Association of Ontario v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 11:23 pm
In Morris v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 12:53 pm
The court granted certiorari in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 am
US Second Circuit Court of Appeals 22-1783, August Term, 2023 Argued: October 25, 2023 Decided: May 21, 2024 Docket No. 22-1783 THE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORKSTATE NURSES ASSOCIATION PENSION PLAN, Petitioner-Appellee, —v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 am
US Second Circuit Court of Appeals 22-1783, August Term, 2023 Argued: October 25, 2023 Decided: May 21, 2024 Docket No. 22-1783 THE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORKSTATE NURSES ASSOCIATION PENSION PLAN, Petitioner-Appellee, —v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:46 pm
Laura von HerzenThe Court of Appeal (Floyd LJ, Kitchin LJ and Longmore LJ) held that there was no issue of principle which prevented the courts from exercising their discretion to grant declarations of the type postulated in Arrow Generics Ltd (i.e. declarations that a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date) in appropriate cases. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:46 pm
Laura von HerzenThe Court of Appeal (Floyd LJ, Kitchin LJ and Longmore LJ) held that there was no issue of principle which prevented the courts from exercising their discretion to grant declarations of the type postulated in Arrow Generics Ltd (i.e. declarations that a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date) in appropriate cases. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
In Fosbre v. [read post]
