Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 68,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 pm
” 3 Rivers Logistics, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
In granted cases, petitioners’ briefs are due Thursday in Allison Engine v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm
The decision came in the case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 10:29 am
Earlier this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued a unanimous decision upholding a circuit court’s ruling in SEC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:34 am
In its orders yesterday, the Court took no action on Harrison, but did grant certiorari in a remarkably similar case, Blueford v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:15 am
See Rick v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:12 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: AC34248 - State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
In State of Louisiana v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:05 am
In a dispute that has been litigated since 2004, a New York state trial court inAgudas Chasidei Chabad of the United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:38 pm
Gouvela v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm
R(on the application of Sayed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R(on the application of Patel) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that Article 8 of the Convention need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant an applicant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
The granting of an order unlimited in point of time could not have been justified by proper disclosure (Brinks Mat Ltd v Elcombe [1988] 1 WLR 1350, 1357). (3) However, the Restraint Order was re-granted but with effect from 29 July 2009, making it later in time than the date on which SIB was wound up by the High Court of Antigua. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:58 am
PSKS, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:51 am
Additional Resources: Wood v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:02 pm
In Shen v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
United States Supreme Court Closes 2023 Term appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
