Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 15,754
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
For us advertising hacks, we’re nothing if not opportunists. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:31 am
No matter what union you’re in, you’re deriving some benefits from it. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:46 am
Is it legal? [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 8:44 pm
There was no other practical way to implement the new services rules under the amended Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 8:28 pm
” And there’s clearly no legal basis for that position, but they have the power and they can say whatever they want. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
” (Citing and quoting from In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1163-1166.) [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 4:33 am
It’s one of those head-shaking moments as the question inevitably gets posed as to whether Sandra Bland was legally entitled to continue smoking her cigarette, despite Trooper Brian Encinia’s “request” that she put it out. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
An executors job comes with many legal obligations. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
The applicable rule is Pa. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
’ In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation, 536 F.3d 1049 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:51 am
Persuader rule imminent! [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:45 am
— via Above the Law Social Media in the 2010s: A Force Awakens — via Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog What Employees Can Legally Say on Facebook—and Get Away With — via Law.com Bashing Your Litigation Opponent in an Online Message Board? [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
An executors job comes with many legal obligations. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 10:10 am
Self-Regulation We’re concerned that proposal allows heads of department or agencies conducting the research to make the final decision whether the research is covered by the Common Rule. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
It is in this sense that the Ethics Council continues to contribute to the construction of transnational legal orders, however characterized (see, e.g., here, and here). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:02 pm
The LA Times plans to appeal the part of the judge’s ruling dealing with the discrimination claims, and surely Mr. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
It is curious to also note that the Appellate Division referred to R. 4:50-1(f) as further possible support for a court’s authority to re-open the executory provisions of a prior Judgment. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:10 am
Texas has a “stand your ground” law, or a self-defense law, which means that you are under NO legal duty to retreat (as long as you’re legal in the spot where you’re threatened). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
No re-presentment was made to the grand jury. [read post]
