Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 8621 - 8640
of 42,093
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2008, 5:34 pm
This was the interest police officers violated in the case before us and in Lauderdale. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:05 pm
Fawcett no longer had any property interest and in which he no longer resided. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:14 am
This week there were two interesting opinions — though, candidly, neither is essential reading. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
And it strains credulity to suggest that an agency charged with gathering intelligence affecting the national security does not have an “intelligence interest” in drone strikes, even if that agency does not operate the drones itself. . . . [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 6:32 am
Balancing the officers' important interest against Franklin's privacy interest in his side/backyard, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the officers were lawfully present at the rear corner of Defendant's home. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:45 am
Dodge City had no reasonable privacy interest in areas of its licensed premises that it actively invites the public to enter. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 1:57 pm
Our Court of Appeals has explained, "[A]s far as the interests of the sovereign are concerned, we perceive the interest of the United States in warrantless searches without probable cause at this "internal" border to be little different from its interest in such searches at its international borders. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:39 am
However, such a search of a laptop computer or other electronic devices does not involve the same "dignity and privacy interests" as the "highly intrusive searches of the person" found to require some level of suspicion such as strip searches or body cavity searches. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:06 am
This Article advocates replacing the broad sweep of housing exceptionalism, and its emphasis on the physical home, with a narrower set of residential privacy interests that are more attentive to substantive privacy and intimate association. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:26 am
., 510 U.S. 43 (1993)); see also Freeman, 242 F.3d at 652 (noting that Supreme Court precedent "forecasts, even if it does not compel, that a balancing of the public and private interests at stake will favor the public interest in nuisance abatement after the conclusion of adequate administrative proceedings" (citing GM Leasing Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:04 am
The exclusive rights of authors, including nondisclosure, are interests recognized by copyright law. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:03 pm
A trustee is duty-bound to act in good faith in the administration of a trust, with honesty and undivided loyalty to the beneficiaries and avoid any circumstances whereby the trustee's personal interest will come in conflict with the interest of the beneficiaries. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:00 am
There's an expected but nevertheless interesting development here that is of interest to those litigating patent infringement cases in Germany's national courts and/or its local divisions of the Unified Patent Court (a new judiciary scheduled to go into operation next year). [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
Mr Carlin sought to appeal on the basis that Santander had assigned the equitable interest in the charge and so could not enforce it. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
Mr Carlin sought to appeal on the basis that Santander had assigned the equitable interest in the charge and so could not enforce it. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
§ 824p(b)(1)(C) (West Supp. 2008) to include the failure or refusal to grant a permit application for more than one year in cases in which the permit application was denied, I respectfully dissent from the contrary holding. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
C. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:31 am
Exemption 7(C) protects a non-trivial privacy interest in keeping “personal facts away from the public eye,” particularly facts that may embarrass, humiliate, or otherwise cause mental or emotional anguish to private citizens. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am
“The weight to be given” the government’s interest in fetal life, “not the strength of the woman’s interest, was the difficult question faced in Roe,” the Casey Court opined. [read post]
