Search for: "In re An. C."
Results 8621 - 8640
of 28,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
The Top-30 list includes only one: the late Justice Antonin Scalia.Acknowledging Scalia’s impact on statutory interpretation, Justice Elena Kagan said in 2015 that “we’re all textualists now. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:06 am
But the problems with Bill C-10 don’t end there. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales c. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
Cop: You’re not going to let me look in your car without a warrant. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm
And all of a sudden you're telling us that, no, you can't vacate it, you do something different. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 12:59 pm
The officer wrote a citation and told the defendant "You're good to go," and then asked if he could ask more questions, and the defendant said "Yes, you may. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:08 am
Rptr. 747; In re Joseph A. (1973), 30 Cal.App. 3d 880, 886, 106 Cal. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:20 pm
If you're a father, you have an equal chance of getting primary custody of the children. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 3:39 am
If you are going to loan a person your car, motorcycle, or other property, you better make sure they have a driver’s license and automobile insurance before you give them the keys unless you're not concerned about being legally liable for their actions. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:40 pm
This is the double edged sword of qualified immunity: When the defense loses on qualified immunity, you're only arguing about the damages. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:17 am
See In re the Applications of the United States for Orders Authorizing the Disclosure of Cell Cite Information, 2005 WL 3658531 (D.D.C. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:06 pm
”Forty percent of commuters love driving and being in their car, which was echoed by commuters in Chicago (40 percent) and Houston (40 percent) who claim they’re content. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:41 am
However, even if it had the time to do so, federal courts cannot allow parties to re-open cases to add evidence after every adverse ruling. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 am
., In re Grand Jury Subpoenas 04-124-03 and 04-124-05, 454 F.3d 511, 522-23 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:05 pm
We're looking for people he considers "suspicious". [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
Wolford to re-enter his van violated Mr. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 11:28 am
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 40 F.3d at 962-63 ("Where an individual's Fourth Amendment rights are not implicated, obtaining the documents does not violate his or her rights, even if the documents lead to indictment. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:36 pm
Regardless of how they’re doing I am a die hard Bears, Cubs and Blackhawks fans. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm
District Court issued its Order authorizing issuance of this subpoena in the case known as In Re Application of Shanghai Xiaosheng Industrial Investment Co. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:37 am
Of course, if you’re trying to challenge agency action, you’d prefer a remand over an outright loss the first time an agency action is reviewed, because it’s better to have a second chance to convince the agency to change direction than to have nothing. [read post]
