Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 13,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Thursday voted 5-4 to reverse [opinion, PDF] the lower court in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
09-1039), and Actavis, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
For purposes of clarity, each activity deserves its own label. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
A: NCCU Law‘s strict-C curve and its 2.0-or-out dismissal policy are both byproducts of being what the administration labels “a school of opportunity. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:38 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
In Koh, a household cleaning product label made express representations of environmental superiority, used the trademarked name “Greenlist,” a name not immediately apt to be associated with the product or its manufacturers, and identified the name as a rating system, which further suggested an independent source that rated other manufacturers’ products as well.The May 26 opinion in Hill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court has decided Turner v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:31 pm
The unanimous opinion in Bond v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm
" I think Chien presents a nice overview and taxonomy of the patent ecosystem, and I like her renaming of patent trolls as "patent-assertion entities"—a term the FTC picked up in a recent report (though I will continue to use the "trolls" label on this blog, in my effort to have recognizable one-word labels).The remainder of Chien's article examines the implications of this ecosystem. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
See Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm
In 2005, MGM v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
The case is already being reduced in the media to an assertion that the infringement of the Broadcasting Code resulted solely from Gaunt’s labelling Stark a Nazi, with some claiming that this case will act as a bulwark against the “Foxification” of UK news. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:51 am
That was the message of National Transportation Safety Board Chair Mark V. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:10 am
Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
In White v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:54 am
In the Lehigh County case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
The case is entitled Reyes v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
