Search for: "No Named Defendant"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 57,363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2021, 10:36 am
This does not mean, as the president’s defenders have often crowed, that Nunes has been vindicated. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
The 14 named survivor plaintiffs were Hungarian nationals or resided in Hungary-annexed countries prior to the war; all became citizens of the United States, Canada, Israel or Australia following the war. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
When the Biden administration takes office on Jan. 20, one place that will likely see quick and decisive change is the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:07 am
Such wilful misconduct had not been alleged by the Defendants and, therefore, the Defendants’ defence must necessarily fail. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:00 pm
They should act to defend their role as a conduit, rather than a publisher. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:29 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, January 12, 2021, at 10:30 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will host a webcast on challenges, triumphs and prospects for the future in Afghanistan. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Before the complete account ban, another Facebook executive defended a decision to remove a video message posted by the president the day after the Capitol riot on the grounds that the country was in an “emergency situation” and “on balance” the video contributed to rather than diminished the risk of ongoing violence. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 5:36 am
Plaintiff named the county, the sheriff, and the deputy as defendants, and defendants moved to dismiss based on several theories under the GTLA. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
Surely there are questions whether defendant owed the plaintiff a fiduciary responsibility to inform him of those negotiations. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The Board found that confusion between defendant’s marks and plaintiff’s marks BROOKLYN and BROOKLYN BREWERY for beer was not inevitable: "If Plaintiff’s CEO has 'no problem' with Defendant’s use of BROOKLYN BREW SHOP on beer-making kits, confusion is not inevitable as to the kits. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
United States (1993) (not to be confused with the famous1974 "Nixon tapes" case of the same name), the Court even ruled that issues involving impeachment procedures are "political questions" almost entirely beyond the reach of judicial review. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 4:10 pm
That Schedule contains the names and contributions of significant donors. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:20 pm
Just by looking at one category of information—for example, "a thousand photographs labeled with dates, locations, and descriptions" or "a record of all [a defendant's] communications . . . as would routinely be kept on a phone"—"the sum of an individual's private life can be reconstructed. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 12:10 pm
He did not know his birthday at age eight and could barely write his name at thirteen. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm
Ignoring the Separateness of the Corporation: Entering into contracts and otherwise transacting business variously in a corporate name and an individual name can justify piercing the corporate veil. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am
How can you defend “x”? [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
Like with third-party servers, basing personal jurisdiction on a nonresident defendant’s operation of a Facebook or Instagram page would expand the reach of California’s long-arm statute beyond the bounds permitted by the Due Process Clause. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:29 am
He was fed their names and pushed them along. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:15 pm
The indictment also alleges that, with the proceeds of the fraud, the defendants engaged in a complex money laundering conspiracy where they created sham pharmacy wholesale companies, which they named after pre-existing pharmacy wholesalers, and fabricated invoices to make it appear that funds transferred from the pharmacies to the sham pharmacy wholesale companies were for legitimate pharmaceutical drug purchases. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:19 pm
Becerra, which the court consolidated for one hour of argument, the justices will hear a pair of challenges to a policy of the California attorney general’s office that requires charities to disclose the names and addresses of their major donors. [read post]
