Search for: "People v. Downs" Results 8621 - 8640 of 16,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
This decision, following on the heels of the May 21, 2013 opinion in Hart v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:23 am
In particular they don’t recognise that particular patent strategies need to be adopted based on the scenario they are in, for example early stage v. late stage, academic tech transfer v. secretive long-term development, and collaborative v. independent research. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:30 am by JB
Here is the third of three sets of discussion questions on Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
 Microsoft v Motorola was a case where the court could settle terms in the knowledge that their determination would resolve the dispute. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:15 am by Guest Blogger
  To see what we mean, one need only look to United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:53 am
Schedule V Substances: Schedule V drugs are considered potentially dangerous drugs with a low potential for abuse and which contain limited quantities of narcotics. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:53 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
A whopping 23 years ago almost to the day, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case called Reno v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm by Old Fox
Clashes started to erupt between both sides after a merge attempt failed,[3] despite the signing of an accord to share power.[4] On 25 June, the Islamist Ansar Dine took control of Kidal.[5]Protests broke out on 26 June in the city of Gao, the majority of whose people are not Tuaregs (as opposed to the MNLA), but rather sub-Saharan groups such as the Songhay and Fula peoples. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Monture’s evidence was informed by the “accumulated knowledge of the Onkwehonwe people as traditionally passed down through the generations, as well as cultural values that emphasize the importance of respecting the natural environment. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am by Amy Howe
As I noted in my preview of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 10:33 am by Oliver Fairhurst
The case is Morley's (Fast Foods) Ltd v Nanthakumar & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 186. [read post]