Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm
The Court used that standard in 1938 in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:24 pm
United States and amending the US countervailing duty law to expressly apply to imports from "non-market economies" like China and Vietnam. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:18 pm
The defendants in Palisades lost on a petition for rehearing en banc which relied on Judge Niemeyer’s dissent, but they recently filed a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court on this critical issue. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Question:Whether, pursuant to the United States’ obligations under the TRIPS Agreement, codified at 19 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am
These difficulties are amplified exponentially when the client is the President of the United States, and he continuously sabotages his lawyers, who are struggling to defend his policies in an already-hostile arena. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 2:29 pm
Today, in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
Malilia was not then eligible for relief, the judge ordered his removal from the United States and Mr. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:29 pm
The H-1B visa is often the only way that an individual can work in the United States for a U.S. entity. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:14 pm
On Wednesday afternoon local time Apple filed a petition asking the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which hears all appeals of U.S. patent infringement cases, for an "initial hearing en banc" on Judge Koh's recent denial of a permanent injunction against Samsung. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petition may not be treated as a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution but may be treated as an application for clarification/directions in the case already decided by this Court, viz., Mr X v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:48 pm
Sleepy’s argued that plaintiffs’ status as employees should be decided under the “right to control” test applied by to ERISA claims by the United States Supreme Court in Nationwide Mutual Ins. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Unite Here Local 355 v Mulhall, in which the Justices are considering whether a so-called neutrality agreement between a union and employer is a thing of “value” within the meaning of Section 302 of the NLRA and thus prohibited as a felony. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
Perhaps anticipating the private sector’s broad interest in the issues to be considered, the court waived the usual requirement for third parties to obtain leave of the court before filing an amicus brief and specifically invited the United States Patent and Trademark Office to state its views. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
United States, 396 U. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403 (1976). [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
The initial claims for asbestos related diseases were filed as workers' compensation claims in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am
United States that the government had to prove that the defendant knew he was an unlawful possessor of a firearm, an element not proven at Jones’s trial. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Wild Horses & Administrative Records: The United States District Court for District of Columbia expanded the administrative record of an agency decision on judicial review when the agency was being entirely unreasonable about the documents in American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign v. [read post]
