Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
Tucker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:43 am
According to the opinion, "The Court is advised without contradiction that not only the Federal Government, including the District of Columbia, but 43 States take the first step toward appointing counsel before, at, or just after initial appearance. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
A10703 Last Act: 06/19/08 referred to economic developmentS8508
MONTGOMERY -- Establishes the department of corrections shall provide an inmate, upon his or her discharge, with educational information about the prevention of HIV Same as A 8849-A Last Act: 06/19/08 SUBSTITUTED BY A8849A06/19/08 RETURNED TO ASSEMBLYS8553
SALAND -- Provides for the automatic revocation of a teaching certificate held by a teacher convicted of a sex offense Same as A11500-A Last Act: 06/19/08… [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
The Baze DecisionOn April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its plurality opinion inBaze v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:13 pm
In a momentous new opinion, the First Circuit declared that last week that intermediate state appellate opinions were not a clear indicator of what Massachusetts law is on “allocation” and has therefore certified the issue to the state’s Supreme Judicial Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:19 pm
” Wichita County v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:08 am
Supreme Court held in Jones v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:02 pm
Wilkins v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:45 pm
Ct. 558, 570 (2007) (internal quotation marks omitted), and when they do, the courts of appeals may not "grant greater factfinding leeway to [the Commission] than to [the] district judge. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 7:11 pm
District Judge John D. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
The group filed an amicus brief in Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
In 1955, the year after Brown, the Supreme Court specified the compliance language for the first decision: Southern school districts would have to comply "with all deliberate speed. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
Shortly after Section 5 was reauthorized in 2006, its constitutionality was challenged in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
The Court first finds that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:51 pm
Kaye has filed a separate lawsuit seeking to compel a pay raise to make the salaries of state judges comparable to those paid to federal district court judges, retroactive to April 1, 2005, at a total cost of $148 million. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
Governor, Legislature Ordered to Raise Pay of State's Judges
New York Law Journal
Finding that New York's Legislature and governor had "unconstitutionally abused their power" by neglecting to raise judicial pay, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Edward H. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
District Judge O'Toole, following the trend of other federal courts, had found that Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Supreme Court, June 02, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
Grandeau, No. 06-4895 "In a First Amendment case stemming from a state lobbying commission's inquiry into whether plaintiff-organization incurred reportable lobbying expenses in connection with a billboard promoting awareness of free speech issues in a private shopping mall, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) although the district court erred in finding that the case was moot because the organization's complaint challenged an… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
