Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 8621 - 8640 of 14,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2013, 10:34 pm by Jeff Richardson
  On Wednesday, Apple and others filed a brief opposing the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
”Lucas Lung, a partner at Lerners LLP, says an important point of the ruling is even though freedom of expression was the focal point, we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that there is an important equality right being protected here.He references a paragraph from the ruling, which states: “In my view, the criticisms point to two conceptual challenges to achieving a consistent application of a prohibition against hate speech. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 3:30 am by Kenneth Kan
If a building loses its identity and specific character, although some materials or component parts remain, it is still considered a total loss.1Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:09 am by Ron Miller
The court distinguished Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v United States, an Eleventh Circuit case that it believed should be “confined to its rather egregious facts. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:40 am by Jeff Gamso
I've quoted from then-Chief Justice Moyer's dissent in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am by Ron Coleman
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has dredged up an old Kentucky opinion from 2003, United State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:53 am by D. Daxton White
The company’s website also states that Ridgewood was “founded to meet specific sector objectives of institutional and high net worth investors. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 8:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The former governor of New York and other public officials may lose a civil rights lawsuit filed by sex offenders who claim that the state's civil confinement law violates the Due Process Clause.The case is Bailey v. [read post]