Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 8621 - 8640 of 57,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2021, 9:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
A regulation effects a taking, we have said, whenever it "goes too far. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Massaro v New York State Thruway Authority, 111 AD3d at 1003, the court said "An unwarranted invasion of personal privacy has been characterized as that which would be offensive and objectionable to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities" Here DCS "particularly and specifically justified its denial" when it stated that the correlation of names and home zip codes invaded employee privacy, and offered to release a summary or… [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 6:04 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Or said in the active voice – people make mistakes. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 6:17 am by Andrew Delaney
No question many of us would like to be here right nowState v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:32 am by INFORRM
Pan v Cheng; Zhou v Cheng [2021] NSWSC 30 – Mr Henry Pan and Chinese Australian Services Society Limited (hereinafter “CASS”) sue for a series of publications said to have been published by the defendant about the first plaintiff and CASS. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Translational similarity may be a special case where consumers react differently [v. my example of the UNC and University of Wisconsin cases in the US where the PTO said that consumers had stubbornly continued to perceive the marks as indicating a single source despite over 100 years, in the former case, of uncontrolled use]. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
And, as that Court has said, this equal treatment is especially sensible in the internet era. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:39 am by Tia Sewell
So far, more than 50 countries have ordered doses of the Sputnik V vaccine. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court stated that the focus of the appeal is the crossing rules, but it is important to read them in context. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am by CMS
The Defendants relied on an early 20th Century authority of Channell J in Gelmini v Moriggia [1913] 2 KB 549, where it was clearly stated that: “…in all cases of contract the person who has to pay has the whole of the day upon which payment is due in which to pay; therefore until the expiration of that day an action cannot be brought because until then there is no complete cause of action. [read post]