Search for: "Thomas View" Results 8621 - 8640 of 12,031
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 7:25 am
Sally Greene, Center for the Study of the American South, has published Judge Thomas Ruffin and the Shadows of Southern History, in volume 17 of Southern Cultures (Fall 2011). [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am by Nabiha Syed
-       At Concurring Opinions, Thomas Crocker considers Justice Alito’s use of the term “privacy” in his opinion for the Court in Kentucky v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:12 pm by cdw
Ex parte State of Alabama; (In re: Thomas Robert Lane v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:08 pm by Michael O'Hear
An ideologically unusual coalition of six justices (Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan) chose the middle-ground option. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am by INFORRM
On the same programme Lord Prescott expressed trenchant views saying to Baroness Buscombe “you’ve got no control over the editors at the Press Complaint Commission. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:53 pm by Jennifer-Clark
Justice Kennedy, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Alito, Jr., Scalia and Thomas. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:21 am by Amy Burns
In an opinion by Justice Breyer that was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan, the Court vacated and remanded the Eleventh Circuit’s decision. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:31 pm by lsammis
Because of this amendment, anyone viewing the packet would be lead to believe that the machine passed this inspection and that no subsequent inspections were performed. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:17 am by Jeff Gamso
Framing era thinkers would have viewed an LWOP sentence eliminating all personal liberty and any future chance of personal liberty for half a century or longer to be more akin to torture than to a death sentence.It strikes me that this is not merely an academic question.At least two justices on the Supreme Court (Thomas and Scalia) are ostensibly committed to the proposition that the Constitution and its Amendments mean exclusively what they were understood to… [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
For those of you attending LSA next week,  or if you're in SF nonetheless, please note that below the fold is information regarding the 10 panels making up the "crimprof" shadow conference. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:17 am
Maybe I'm just overly cynical, but that's what I feel in my heart of hearts. __________ * Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Roberts. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:15 pm by Aaron Bruhl
"* Concurring in the judgment, Justice Scalia (joined by the Chief and Justice Thomas) concludes that the text is clear and so there is no need to consider anything else. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:14 pm
In my view, the omission by the parties to agree on place of arbitration makes Part I of A&C applicable is contrary to principles stated earlier. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:53 pm by Alfred Brophy
Vaughn also have essays here -- Karthik's on the Alabama anti-sex toys statute and  Alexander's on the standards for plain view searches involving computers. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:37 pm by Lovechilde
--Thomas Paine Those who founded this country knew quite well that every citizen must remain vigilant or freedom would be lost. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The answer may be in an expanded view of municipal liability. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:16 am by Orin Kerr
We are not permitted to render an advisory opinion, and if the same judgment would be rendered by the state court after we corrected its views of federal laws, our review could amount to nothing more than an advisory opinion. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:51 am by Lyle Denniston
  Even on the points on which Justice Thomas declined to join the Roberts opinion, there was a 4-3 majority making those sections, too, binding law. [read post]