Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 9,462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2008, 9:33 pm
Lacey Rana Smith Issue: Whether police violated the Fourth Amendment by asking a car passenger to consent to a search unrelated to the initial reason for the traffic stop. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:57 pm
Last year, I did a post in which I talked about the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:22 pm
Initially, the Supreme Court held in Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:16 am
Presumably, this claim would rely in part on the Bush v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:16 am
Presumably, this claim would rely in part on the Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
In Emma Murray v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
The case is Caperton v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:25 pm
To download a copy of the Court of Appeals' decision, please use this link: Pludeman v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
Boyd v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:05 pm
Not to take things too lightly, but I had a chance to watch Strange Brew again this week, and I noted a surprising amount of legal content: re: the mouse in the bottle that started it all, see M'Alister (or donoghue) v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 As Bob and Doug make their initial claim for free beer, Bob informs us “Its in the Canadian Criminal Code” At several moments, Doug expresses awareness of the legal consequences of whatever ill-considered plan they… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:29 pm
In KSR v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:28 pm
Town of Plainfield, Indiana (check it for a number of useful links), Bruce C. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:29 am
Then again it may be that Kevin Smith just upsets folks. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
In Matter of Smith v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:40 pm
In a short decision in the Newsday circulation fraud case, United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Judge Milan Smith writes a dissent, joined by three other judges. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 12:54 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:52 am
He is a simple Kat who has never felt that a complex test is needed and he mourns the passage of Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183 -- a decision that seems to be floating in a sort of precedental limbo, no longer authoritative but still worthy enough to cite. [read post]
