Search for: "United States v. Robert"
Results 8621 - 8640
of 9,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:30 am
Co. of America v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
United States, 249 U.S. 47, 52 (1919). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:39 am
Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, ... [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:19 am
Ferguson the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Louisiana statute mandating separate but (in reality not) equal railway accommodations for black and white passengers did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
As Noreiga's reply brief states, "[t]he decision below affects the rights of hundreds of prisoners in United States' custody. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am
Circuit released its opinion in Al Bihani v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm
The Supreme Court asked the United States for its view on whether cert should be granted on the questions the NFL wanted answered. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
As evidence, he notes that the Court has released only four opinions thus far, and has still not issued an opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:45 am
., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
The boys were subsequently sentenced to life in prison and their cases are now before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
v=PlpBB4o8xq8 [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:19 pm
The first case to be tried under the new law was United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:36 pm
Or did they disagree with Chief Justice Marshall when he wrote, "The Government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:45 pm
In that case, federal district court judge Robert Gettleman noted his awareness of Sunbelt and its rejection of the legitimate business interest test, but he applied the test anyway, noting that “[t]he Illinois Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and this court, however, have not rejected the applications of the legitimate business interest test. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:07 pm
" Fantasyscotus.net continues to generate attention, and this weekend Josh Blackman analyzes the predications for the outcome of Citizens United v. [read post]
