Search for: "DOE 5"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 84,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Safeway Stores, Inc. (5/8/13, pub. 5/24/13) --- Cal.App.4th ---, Kenneth Bluford worked as a truck driver out of a distribution center operated by Safeway. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm
This instruction does not come into play when the defendant admits he/she took the property, but, perhaps, defends the case by saying he/she had a right to take it. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:36 am
IPO Vital Signs does not track closed-end funds, best efforts or non-underwritten deals, or IPO offerings for amounts less than $5 million. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 1:34 pm
A bench trial was supposed to start on November 5 but canceled after Judge Barbara B. [read post]
2 May 2017, 4:30 pm
"Does Cooperating with ICE Harm Local Police? [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:20 am
The resulting settlement calls for Kik to pay a $5 million civil penalty. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
Here is the schedule:Initial summary judgment motions from all parties are due September 30, 2013.Response briefs are due October 24, 2013.Final reply briefs are due October 31, 2013.The election is November 5, 2013AG Cuccinelli's office, on behalf of the Commonwealth will have to file major briefs 36 days, 12 days, and 5 days before the gubernatorial election. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 5:33 pm
The Ruling provides that "we are required to evaluate all the evidence in the case record that may have a bearing on our determination or decision of disability, including decisions by other governmental and nongovernmental agencies (20 CFR 404.1512(b)(5) and 416.912(b)(5)). [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 11:41 am
It does not express anyone else's views except for the author's. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm
The question in Trevino was whether Martinez applies when it is unclear under state law whether the claims in question could have been raised on direct appeal.In an opinion delivered by Justice Breyer, the Court held by a vote of 5-4 that the good cause exception in Martinez does apply when a State’s procedural framework, by reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful… [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:34 am
However, mailing by regular mail on August 29, 2011 meant it was not "filed" until September 5, 2011. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
What does it mean for migration policies? [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:54 pm
The 9th reiterates that a Court does not personally have to explain the elements of the offense. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Given the fact that D8 and D9 have the same filing date as the patent-in-suit and therefore do not represent state of the art according to A 54(2) EPC 1973 or A 54(3), these documents cannot be used for any novelty objection. [2.3] Furthermore, the patent-in-suit does not define a sub-range of a broader numerical range, but a selection of individual (classes of) enzymes mentioned distinct from the ones used in D7. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:41 pm
Producers with over a billion dollars under management are not going to accept a cap on the transition bonus of $5 million. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:00 am
Slip op. at 5-6. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:48 am
5. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:54 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled five (5) oral hearings for the month of February, as listed below. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:58 am
If the alleged harasser does not qualify as a "supervisor," the plaintiff will need to prove that the employer was negligent in allowing the harassment to occur, a showing not necessary for supervisor-based harassment. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:14 pm
Conversely, a conservatorship does not have a set end date. [read post]
