Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 21,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” General commentary on the nomination comes from Rep. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:00 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
The plaintiffs wanted to litigate whether the Attorney General had denied a waiver to invited Marxist speakers in violation of the First Amendment rights of the hosts. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
There are exceptions, but this is the general rule. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
Lynch, the Attorney General had attempted to apply a new agency rule retroactively to prohibit a noncitizen from receiving relief under federal immigration law. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
(v) Effective immediately, it is the policy of the United States to build a more modern, more secure, and more resilient Executive Branch IT architecture. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm
In Larson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:35 am
LaRoche v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
Similarly, certifications under Section 702 of FISA are approved jointly by the DNI and Attorney General. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Kraft Food Brands Group LLC, No 16-341 (Does the general and broad definition of “residence” found in 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) apply to the patent venue statute 1400(b)) Oral arguments set for March 27, 2017 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 2:00 am
Solis v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:32 am
The Court observed that the appropriateness of such an award “depends on the same general standards that apply when attorney’s fees are to be awarded to prevailing parties only as a matter of the court’s discretion. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
What is meant by the “joint financial responsibility” language is that the referring and the referred attorney are essentially in a one-case-only general partnership for purposes of the representation – if one of the attorneys is sued for malpractice in connection with the case, the other is liable too. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 6:00 am
Watts Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:47 am
None of them would apply to what the respondent has done.[69] The Alberta Court of Appeal interpreted similar statutory language in Alberta’s Personal Information Protection Act, SA 2003, c P-6.5: United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401 v Alberta (Attorney General), 2012 ABCA 130 (CanLII), [2012] AJ No 427, aff’d 2013 SCC 62 (CanLII), [2013] 3 SCR 733 [United Food]. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:34 am
” (quoting Hilton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:00 am
Sanders v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
(Pl.'s SUMF ¶ 58) On April 7, 2015, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Frank Miller dismissed the case against Plaintiff by nolle prosequi. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 11:06 am
In Brown v. [read post]
