Search for: "English v. English" Results 8641 - 8660 of 11,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:18 pm by Dan
It is not at all uncommon for English language publications to write about our posts on here, but it is quite uncommon for Chinese language publications to do so. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 pm by dlinhart
M-M-M-Mildred Loving (Loving v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm by Marie Louise
: Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v Roche Molecular Systems Inc (IPKat) US: That was unexpectedly…  well… expected: BPAI affirms Examiner’s obviousness rejection in Ex Parte Akio Ochiai concerning a health food product containing curcumin, scymnol and isoflavones (BT-IP Notes) US: VirginiaTech VERSUS series – Drug evaluation DVDs available (FDA Law Blog) Products Diovan HCT (Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide) – Germany:… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am by Saf Hussain
  NML also added that the terms applicable to the bonds meant that Argentina had submitted to the jurisdiction of the English court and thereby waived any immunity from suit. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by SHG
” In short, as summed up by the court in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm by Graeme Hall
Click here for Rosalind English’s detailed discussion of the bill. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
The Bookseller reported that the “trade bodies” welcomed the Bill – referring to the Publishers’ Association, the Society of Authors and English PEN. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
I’ve recently started working on a book about reformers’ ideologies and strategies in Sheff v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:06 am by INFORRM
These clarifications might have been thought unnecessary given that they would in part codify the existing English common law rules, and that are in part unlikely to be necessary in so far as they apply to juries. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am by INFORRM
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the  case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]