Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8641 - 8660 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 7:40 am by Jamie Williams and Karen Gullo
We also explained that the injunction violated clear Supreme Court case law and Yelp’s due process rights, and that the injunction violates Section 230, which prohibits courts from holding websites liable for the speech of third parties. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by J. Ross Pepper
 Here are the basic facts of that case: Plaintiffs agreed to do certain grading and other work on Defendants property The parties orally agreed that Plaintiffs would be paid $2,500 Plaintiffs were paid $1,000 up front After the Plaintiffs began working, the Plaintiffs performed additional work beyond the work to which the parties had agreed The parties never discussed what Plaintiffs would be paid for the additional work After the work was finished, the Plaintiffs sent… [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by J. Ross Pepper
 Here are the basic facts of that case: Plaintiffs agreed to do certain grading and other work on Defendants property The parties orally agreed that Plaintiffs would be paid $2,500 Plaintiffs were paid $1,000 up front After the Plaintiffs began working, the Plaintiffs performed additional work beyond the work to which the parties had agreed The parties never discussed what Plaintiffs would be paid for the additional work After the work was finished, the Plaintiffs sent… [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:14 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
A recent case illustrates how one plaintiff’s failure to name the correct defendant ended up delaying the case for months, possibly years. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 7:41 am by Cathy Moran
Leave out a legal right or pending lawsuit and the defendant in that suit can have your lawsuit dismissed. [read post]
The defendants sought the dismissal of their case by arguing that the Hazing Act didn’t apply, that Illinois’ law related to social hosts did apply, and that, under this law, they could not be liable. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:39 am by Stan Gibson
In this patent infringement action, Plaintiff Wright’s Well Control Services, LLC (WWCS) filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss defendant Christopher Mancini pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) with prejudice, but with a “reservation of all rights and actions against co-defendant Oceaneering International, Inc., and any other parties and solidary obligors. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 8:15 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
A defendant (business) may not be liable where plaintiff (the injured person) acts in a manner that disregards ordinary caution or reasonable care in the face of a known or obvious dangerous condition. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Rachel Adams Ladeau
Relying on principles from the Restatements (Second) of Torts and Agency, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the court held that Illinois’s negligent hiring, supervision, and retention law was broad enough to allow Cooper’s employer to be held liable for his actions. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 3:50 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  The jury found the defendant not liable, because the members assumed that telling the surgeons was sufficient. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The federal court of appeals reversed the ruling, holding the president liable like any other citizen. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The second caveat to the Supreme Court’s ruling is that it interpreted the effect of the MGN v UK case as being that: “where a claim involves restricting a defendants freedom of expression, it would normally be a breach of its article 10 rights to require it to reimburse the claimant any success fee or ATE premium which he would be liable to pay” (emphasis added). [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ashkouti’s savvy business structuring of his family’s investment companies was clearly done to avoid opening him up to personal liability for his financial real estate dealings. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:43 am by Todd Janzen
 Other contracts may even include indemnity for the tech provider, meaning that if the provider is sued because it recommended its user spray Dicamba, the user must defend the provider in court. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 2:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Recall that a jury had found Rolling Stone liable for $1 million and writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely liable for $2 million, based on what it concluded were false statements about University of Virginia Associate Dean Nicole Eramo in its “Rape on Campus” article; that award was being appealed, but the appeal has now been settled (as to both defendants). [read post]