Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 8641 - 8660 of 39,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The February 12, 2019 order in the case by Central District of California Judge Stephen V. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
Victims are left with little trust in the system, but want lawmakers to address and fix this problem. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Ryan Scoville
Given the many challenges that confront U.S. policymakers, one could argue that there’s little room for deficiencies of any kind in U.S. representation to states in any of these regions. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Hornak of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:59 am by Kent Scheidegger
Science has little or nothing to do with it.The first case was decided 5-3, with Justice Scalia's chair vacant and Chief Justice Roberts dissenting, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
(Another, still pending at the Court, is Kinder Morgan Energy Partners v. [read post]
In addition, the EDPB states that informed consent pursuant to Chapter V of the CTR “responds to core ethical requirements of research projects deriving from the Helsinki Declaration and is primarily a measure to ensure the protection of the right to human dignity and the right to integrity of individuals under Article 1 and 3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU; it is not conceived as an instrument for data protection compliance. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:56 am by Richard Hunt
Many of the default judgment cases we read include an injunction that could never be enforced by contempt, and if federal courts were a little more careful about granting meaningful relief based on the pleadings the kind of result found in Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:05 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court could help rein in the administrative state by overruling Auer v. [read post]