Search for: "Love v State"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 9,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule in the Quill v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:42 am
United States and Peretz v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
A more conservative state high court, with a more formal vision of equality, should accept the Loving analogy.Not that I'm naive enough to think that this will happen.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:06 pm
Supreme Court's opinion finally invalidating all miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:35 pm
I would love to hear whether that usage is actionable. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:03 am
(As an example, consider school finance litigation: love it or hate it, would you really want this issue -- about which the states and experts are deeply perplexed -- federalized?) [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
For example, in footnote 9, Judge Hawkins says the following, which I totally loved: "While I have great respect for the author of the Opinion distinguishedprior service as a senior Department of Justice official [Judge Fisher was an Associate Attorney General] , I wonder if recent experience might suggest that the comfort he finds in the supervision of Main Justice officials over the activities of United States Attorneys might not always be well placed. [read post]
15 May 2008, 2:24 pm
The furor: Justice Corrigan joined the majority opinion in National Pride at Work v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Medtronic v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Medtronic v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
Don't you just love politics? [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:57 am
Sharp, which prompted numerous states to abandon their anti-miscegenation laws, eventually leading to Loving v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:12 pm
This could be a wacky case like Adlerstein v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:10 pm
The case is Loving v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:00 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:47 am
v=LJda5OJep_8). [read post]
11 May 2008, 1:14 pm
People love sharing what they know with like-minded friends. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
This prescriber testimony was uncontroverted, so the defendant won, despite the state-law presumption.Odom v. [read post]
