Search for: "North v. State" Results 8641 - 8660 of 13,330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
I support and uphold the views stated by our officers”. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:20 am by Jeff Welty
” This News and Observer story states that 63% of North Carolina residents support medical marijuana while 42% support full legalization for adults. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:22 am by Mack Sperling
Section 6-21.5 of the North Carolina General Statutes is the closest thing the State has to "loser pays." [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
 Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:56 am by Jamie Markham
Because you should always use the grid that was in place when the defendant committed his or her crime—and there’s no flexibility on that, by the way, State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by Ben
The claim was brought by newspaper publisher North Jersey Media Group who sued the former darling of the Tea Party and vice presidential candidate, and her political action committee, last September, claiming copyright infringement over the use of an iconic 9/11 photograph. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:08 am by Kit Case
In 2013 one employee fraud case did crack the Top Ten, so the record is now 49-1 (employer fraud v. employee fraud) over the past five years. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 3 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor & linked cases [2014] UKSC 3 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:54 pm by admin
In June 2013, Parliament passed amendments to the ICA primarily directed at review of acquisitions by foreign state-owned enterprises (“SOE”). [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense of… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Daniel Webster is thought to have coined that phrase in his oral arguments in the Supreme Court case, McCulloch v. [read post]